"including but not limited to" vs "including without limitation"

Question

"including but not limited to" vs "including without limitation"

Both phrases are correct and commonly used in legal and formal writing to introduce examples without restricting them to the ones listed. They serve the same purpose and can be used interchangeably.

Last Updated: March 28, 2024

This phrase is used to introduce examples without implying that the list is exhaustive. It is often seen in legal documents, contracts, and formal agreements.

Alternatives:

including without limitation
including, without limitation,
including, without limitation, the following:
including, without limitation, the following items:
including, but not limited to, the following:

This phrase is used to introduce examples without implying that the list is exhaustive. It is often seen in legal documents, contracts, and formal agreements.

Alternatives:

including but not limited to
including, but not limited to
including, without limitation,
including, without limitation, the following:
including, without limitation, the following items:

Answer 1

including but not limited to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in legal and formal contexts to introduce examples without restricting them to the ones listed.

Answer 2

including without limitation

This phrase is correct and commonly used in legal and formal contexts to introduce examples without restricting them to the ones listed.

"including but not limited to" vs "including without limitation"

including but not limited to

including without limitation

Related Comparisons