"allocated to" vs "allocated in"

Question

"allocated to" vs "allocated in"

Both 'allocated to' and 'allocated in' are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Allocated to' is commonly used when assigning something to a specific person or group, while 'allocated in' is used when referring to the location or category where something is assigned.

Last Updated: March 23, 2024

Use 'allocated to' when assigning resources, tasks, or responsibilities to a particular individual or group.

Examples:

The budget was allocated to different departments.
The new project was allocated to the marketing team.
Funds were allocated to support the research.
Tasks were allocated to team members based on their skills.
Responsibilities were allocated to each team member.

Alternatives:

assigned to
distributed to
apportioned to
allotted to
given to

Use 'allocated in' when specifying the location, category, or context in which resources or items are assigned.

Examples:

The funds were allocated in the budget for marketing expenses.
The new employees were allocated in the HR department.
The tasks were allocated in the project plan.
The resources were allocated in the strategic plan.
The budget was allocated in different categories.

Alternatives:

assigned in
distributed in
apportioned in
allotted in
given in

Answer 1

allocated to

This phrase is correct and commonly used when assigning something to a specific person or group.

Answer 2

allocated in

This phrase is correct and is used when referring to the location or category where something is assigned.

"allocated to" vs "allocated in"

allocated to

allocated in

Related Comparisons