"people allocated to" vs "people allocated for"

Question

"people allocated to" vs "people allocated for"

Both 'people allocated for' and 'people allocated to' are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'People allocated for' is used when referring to people designated or intended for a specific purpose, while 'people allocated to' is used when referring to people assigned or distributed to a particular group or task.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

This phrase is used when referring to people assigned or distributed to a particular group or task. For example, 'The new employees were allocated to different departments.'

Examples:

The tasks were allocated to the team members.
The students were allocated to their respective dormitories.
The resources were allocated to the different projects.

Alternatives:

people assigned to
people distributed to
people designated to
people placed in
people assigned for

This phrase is used when referring to people designated or intended for a specific purpose. For example, 'The funds were allocated for the people affected by the disaster.'

Examples:

The resources were allocated for the new project team.
The scholarships were allocated for students in need.
The rooms were allocated for the conference attendees.

Alternatives:

people designated for
people intended for
people earmarked for
people set aside for
people reserved for

Answer 1

people allocated to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

people allocated for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"people allocated to" vs "people allocated for"

people allocated to

people allocated for

Related Comparisons