"worthy to be read" vs "worthy to read"

Question

"worthy to be read" vs "worthy to read"

Both "worthy to read" and "worthy to be read" are correct phrases, but they are used in slightly different contexts. "Worthy to read" is more commonly used when describing a book, article, or piece of writing that is worth reading. On the other hand, "worthy to be read" is used in a more formal or literary context, where the passive voice is preferred.

Last Updated: March 23, 2024

This phrase is used when emphasizing the value or importance of reading a particular piece of writing, often in a more formal or literary setting.

Examples:

The classic novel is worthy to be read by all generations.
The historical document is truly worthy to be read by scholars.
The epic poem is considered worthy to be read in schools.
The philosophical treatise is definitely worthy to be read by intellectuals.
The scientific paper is highly worthy to be read by researchers.

Alternatives:

deserving to be read
meriting a read
deserving of being read
worth your time to be read
worth reading

This phrase is used to describe a book, article, or piece of writing that is considered valuable or worthwhile to read.

Examples:

This novel is definitely worthy to read.
The article provides valuable insights and is worthy to read.
The poetry collection is truly worthy to read.
The magazine features articles that are worthy to read.
The blog post is highly worthy to read.

Alternatives:

worth reading
deserving to be read
meriting a read
deserving of a read
worth your time to read

Answer 1

worthy to be read

This phrase is correct but less commonly used than "worthy to read." It is typically used in more formal or literary contexts.

Answer 2

worthy to read

This phrase is correct and commonly used when describing something that is worth reading.

"worthy to be read" vs "worthy to read"

worthy to be read

worthy to read

Related Comparisons