"easy-to-read" vs "easy to read"

Question

"easy-to-read" vs "easy to read"

Both "easy-to-read" and "easy to read" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Easy-to-read" is used as a compound adjective before a noun, while "easy to read" is used as an adjective followed by a verb or noun. They are not directly comparable as they serve different grammatical functions.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

Use "easy-to-read" when you want to describe something as being easy to read, such as an easy-to-read book or an easy-to-read font.

Examples:

The easy-to-read instructions made assembly a breeze.
She prefers easy-to-read novels with simple language.

Use "easy to read" when you want to describe how easy it is to read something, such as a book that is easy to read or a font that is easy to read.

Examples:

The book is easy to read and understand.
The font size makes the text easy to read.

Answer 1

easy-to-read

This phrase is correct when used as a compound adjective before a noun to describe something that is easy to read.

Answer 2

easy to read

This phrase is correct when used as an adjective followed by a verb or noun to describe the ease of reading something.

"easy-to-read" vs "easy to read"

easy-to-read

easy to read

Related Comparisons