"without" vs "without track"

Question

"without" vs "without track"

The phrases 'without track' and 'without' are not directly comparable as 'without track' seems to be incomplete and lacks context. 'Without' is a preposition that is commonly used in English to indicate the absence of something. If 'without track' is meant to convey the absence of a track or pathway, it would be more appropriate to use 'without a track' or 'without any track'.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

You can use 'without' followed by a noun or noun phrase to indicate the absence of that thing.

If you want to convey the absence of a track or pathway, it would be more appropriate to use 'without a track' or 'without any track'.

Alternatives:

without a track
without any track

Answer 1

without

This is a correct and commonly used preposition in English to indicate the absence of something.

Answer 2

without track

This phrase seems incomplete and lacks context. It is not a common or correct construction in English.

"without" vs "without track"

without

without track

Related Comparisons