"without a voice" vs "without voice"

Question

"without a voice" vs "without voice"

Both 'without voice' and 'without a voice' are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Without voice' is more poetic and abstract, often used in literary or artistic expressions. On the other hand, 'without a voice' is more common in everyday language to indicate someone or something lacking the ability to speak.

Last Updated: March 26, 2024

This phrase is used in everyday language to indicate someone or something lacking the ability to speak or express themselves verbally.

Examples:

The marginalized communities were often without a voice in the decision-making process.
The animal rights activists fight for those without a voice.

Alternatives:

voiceless
unable to speak
muted

This phrase is often used in a more artistic or literary context to convey a sense of silence, powerlessness, or lack of expression.

Examples:

The painting spoke volumes without voice.
The music conveyed emotions without voice.

Alternatives:

voiceless
mute
silent

Answer 1

without a voice

This phrase is correct and commonly used in everyday language.

Answer 2

without voice

This phrase is correct and can be used in a poetic or abstract context.

"without a voice" vs "without voice"

without a voice

without voice

Related Comparisons