"with p-value" vs "variables included into the model"

Question

"with p-value" vs "variables included into the model"

The phrases 'with p-value' and 'variables included into the model' are not directly comparable as they serve different purposes. 'With p-value' is used to indicate the significance level of a statistical test result, while 'variables included into the model' refers to the predictors used in a statistical model.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

This phrase is used in statistical analysis to show the p-value associated with a hypothesis test, indicating the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis.

Examples:

The experiment yielded a p-value of 0.03, indicating a significant result.
The p-value of the test was less than 0.05, suggesting a rejection of the null hypothesis.

Alternatives:

with a significance level
based on the p-value
according to the p-value
as indicated by the p-value
with statistical significance

This phrase is used in statistical modeling to describe the predictors or independent variables that are part of a model being analyzed.

Examples:

The regression analysis had three variables included in the model.
The variables included in the model were found to have a significant impact on the outcome.

Alternatives:

predictors in the model
independent variables in the model
factors included in the model
covariates in the model
regressors in the model

Answer 1

with p-value

This phrase is correct and commonly used in statistical analysis to indicate the significance level of a test result.

Answer 2

variables included into the model

This phrase is correct and commonly used in statistical modeling to refer to the predictors or independent variables used in a model.

"with p-value" vs "variables included into the model"

with p-value

variables included into the model

Related Comparisons