"with a duration of" vs "have a duration of"

Question

"with a duration of" vs "have a duration of"

Both "with a duration of" and "have a duration of" are correct and commonly used phrases in English. They can be used interchangeably depending on the context. The choice between them may depend on personal preference or the overall style of writing.

Last Updated: March 28, 2024

This phrase is used to specify the length of time something lasts or continues. It is often used in descriptions, reports, or presentations.

Examples:

The concert will last for two hours with a duration of 120 minutes.
The movie has a duration of 90 minutes.
The training session, with a duration of one hour, will start at 10 a.m.
The event, with a duration of three days, attracted a large audience.
The lecture, with a duration of 45 minutes, was informative.

Alternatives:

have a duration of
lasting for
spanning
running for
extending over

This phrase is also used to specify the length of time something lasts or continues. It is suitable for various contexts, such as formal writing, technical descriptions, or casual conversations.

Examples:

The presentation will have a duration of 30 minutes.
Each episode of the series has a duration of 45 minutes.
The project has a duration of six months.
The course has a duration of one year.
The flight has a duration of eight hours.

Alternatives:

with a duration of
lasting for
spanning
running for
extending over

Answer 1

with a duration of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

have a duration of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"with a duration of" vs "have a duration of"

with a duration of

have a duration of

Related Comparisons