"with a capacity of" vs "with capacity of"

Question

"with a capacity of" vs "with capacity of"

Both "with a capacity of" and "with capacity of" are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. "With a capacity of" is more commonly used and is suitable when specifying a particular amount or size, while "with capacity of" is more general and can be used when discussing the general capability or potential of something.

Last Updated: March 26, 2024

This phrase is used when specifying a particular amount or size of something, such as a container, room, or device.

Examples:

The tank comes with a capacity of 100 gallons.
The theater has a seating area with a capacity of 500 people.
The new stadium was built with a capacity of 50,000 spectators.

Alternatives:

with a maximum capacity of
with a storage capacity of
with a weight capacity of
with a volume capacity of
with a passenger capacity of

This phrase is more general and can be used when discussing the general capability or potential of something without specifying a particular amount or size.

Examples:

The new software comes with capacity of handling large datasets.
The team has shown great capacity of working under pressure.
The organization has the capacity of adapting to changing market conditions.

Alternatives:

with the capacity to
with the capability of
with the potential to
with the ability to
with the skill to

Answer 1

with a capacity of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

with capacity of

This phrase is correct but less commonly used in English.

"with a capacity of" vs "with capacity of"

with a capacity of

with capacity of

Related Comparisons