"were seated at" vs "were seated on"

Question

"were seated at" vs "were seated on"

Both "were seated on" and "were seated at" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Were seated on" is used when referring to a surface or object where someone is sitting, while "were seated at" is used when referring to a location or place where someone is sitting.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate the location or place where someone is sitting. For example, "They were seated at the dining table."

Examples:

The students were seated at their desks in the classroom.
We were seated at the front row of the theater.
She was seated at the head of the conference table.
They were seated at the outdoor cafe enjoying the sunshine.
He was seated at the bar, waiting for his friends.

Alternatives:

were sitting at
were positioned at
were located at
were placed at
were stationed at

This phrase is used to indicate the surface or object on which someone is sitting. For example, "They were seated on the comfortable couch."

Examples:

The children were seated on the grass for a picnic.
She was seated on the edge of the bed, lost in thought.
The guests were seated on the wooden benches in the garden.
He was seated on a large rock, enjoying the view.
The cat was seated on the windowsill, watching the birds outside.

Alternatives:

were sitting on
were perched on
were positioned on
were placed on
were located on

Answer 1

were seated at

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to a location or place where someone is sitting.

Answer 2

were seated on

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to a surface or object where someone is sitting.

"were seated at" vs "were seated on"

were seated at

were seated on

Related Comparisons