"are acknowledged on" vs "are acknowledged with"

Question

"are acknowledged on" vs "are acknowledged with"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Are acknowledged on' is used when referring to a list or specific place where someone or something is acknowledged, while 'are acknowledged with' is used when mentioning the method or means by which someone or something is acknowledged.

Last Updated: March 28, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate the location or list where someone or something is acknowledged. It is often followed by the specific place or list.

Examples:

The winners are acknowledged on the website.
Employees are acknowledged on the company's bulletin board.
Students are acknowledged on the honor roll.
Contributors are acknowledged on the acknowledgments page.
Athletes are acknowledged on the Wall of Fame.

Alternatives:

are recognized on
are mentioned on
are listed on
are featured on
are highlighted on

This phrase is used to indicate the method or means by which someone or something is acknowledged. It is often followed by the specific method or means.

Examples:

The award winners are acknowledged with a certificate.
Employees are acknowledged with a bonus.
Students are acknowledged with a special ceremony.
Contributors are acknowledged with a thank-you note.
Athletes are acknowledged with a trophy.

Alternatives:

are recognized with
are honored with
are rewarded with
are celebrated with
are presented with

Answer 1

are acknowledged on

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to a list or specific place where someone or something is acknowledged.

Answer 2

are acknowledged with

This phrase is correct and commonly used when mentioning the method or means by which someone or something is acknowledged.

"are acknowledged on" vs "are acknowledged with"

are acknowledged on

are acknowledged with

Related Comparisons