"was wet to the core" vs "was wet to core"

Question

"was wet to the core" vs "was wet to core"

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but they have slightly different meanings. 'Was wet to the core' implies being completely soaked or drenched, while 'was wet to core' could suggest being wet at a fundamental level. The choice between the two depends on the intended meaning.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

This phrase is used to emphasize that someone or something is thoroughly wet, usually after being exposed to a lot of water or rain.

Examples:

After walking in the rain for hours, she was wet to the core.
The clothes were wet to the core after being caught in the storm.
The swimmer emerged from the pool wet to the core.

Alternatives:

was soaked to the core
was drenched to the core
was completely wet
was thoroughly soaked

This phrase could suggest being wet at a deep or fundamental level, rather than just on the surface.

Alternatives:

was wet to the bone
was wet through and through
was wet to the soul
was wet to the very core

Answer 1

was wet to the core

This phrase is correct and commonly used to indicate being completely soaked or drenched.

Answer 2

was wet to core

This phrase is correct but less common. It could imply being wet at a fundamental level.

"was wet to the core" vs "was wet to core"

was wet to the core

was wet to core

Related Comparisons