"was wet to the core" vs "was wet to his core"

Question

"was wet to the core" vs "was wet to his core"

Both phrases are correct and commonly used in English. They convey the idea of being completely soaked or drenched. The choice between 'to his core' and 'to the core' depends on personal preference or the specific context in which they are used.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

This phrase also means that someone or something is completely soaked or drenched to the innermost part of their being. It conveys the same idea as 'to his core' but uses a slightly different preposition.

Examples:

The swimmer emerged from the pool wet to the core.
The clothes were wet to the core after being caught in the rain.
The dog shook itself, leaving the room wet to the core.

Alternatives:

was wet to his core
was soaked to the core
was drenched to the core
was saturated to the core
was dripping wet to the core

This phrase means that someone or something is completely soaked or drenched to the innermost part of their being. It emphasizes the depth or extent of the wetness.

Examples:

After standing in the rain for hours, he was wet to his core.
The storm was so intense that the house was wet to its core.
She fell into the river and was wet to her core.

Alternatives:

was wet to the core
was soaked to the core
was drenched to the core
was saturated to the core
was dripping wet to the core

Answer 1

was wet to the core

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

was wet to his core

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"was wet to the core" vs "was wet to his core"

was wet to the core

was wet to his core

Related Comparisons