variables included into the model vs variables included in the model

Both phrases are correct, but "variables included in the model" is more commonly used in English. The preposition "in" is typically used to indicate inclusion within a group or set, making it the more appropriate choice in this context.

Last updated: March 17, 2024 • 1863 views

This phrase is correct but less commonly used in English.

"variables included into the model"

This phrase is grammatically correct but less common in English. It implies that the variables were added or inserted into the model.

Show examples from the web [+]

Jun 3, 2007 ... ... estimate -xtivreg2....,fe- 1) would it look reasonable to use as instruments lags of some of the exogenous variables included into the model?
independent variables included into the model exists between total economy ratio and current ratio and it is of moderate strength (0.4477) (Table 8). Table 8.
Nov 6, 2014 ... accuracy of the bankruptcy prediction models versus the number of individual predictor variables included into the model. There are also many ...
Moustafa (2007) which is 45 per cent (Aljifri & Moustafa, 2007). This can attributed to the limited number of the independent variables included into the model.

Alternatives:

variables included in the model
variables added to the model
variables inserted in the model
variables incorporated into the model
variables integrated into the model

This phrase is commonly used in English.

"variables included in the model"

This phrase is the more common way to express that certain variables are part of the model. The preposition "in" is typically used to indicate inclusion within a group or set.

Show examples from the web [+]

The causal interpretation is primary, and defines exogeneity in terms of the factor s causal independence from the other variables included in the model.
Variable Selection. In our discussion of regression to date we have assumed that all the explanatory variables included in the model are chosen in advance.
... but I am wondering what happened here that brought the change? Can I trust the output with the observed variables included in the model
Tests the joint effect of the explanatory variables included in the model. Small p- values reject the null hypothesis that all slope parameters are equal to zero, .

Alternatives:

variables included into the model
variables added to the model
variables inserted in the model
variables incorporated into the model
variables integrated into the model

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

variables included into the model vs variables included in the model

"variables included into the model"

"variables included in the model"

Related Comparisons