"unwillingness to" vs "unwillingness of"

Question

"unwillingness to" vs "unwillingness of"

Both "unwillingness of" and "unwillingness to" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Unwillingness of" is used when referring to the unwillingness possessed by someone or something, while "unwillingness to" is used when expressing the lack of willingness to do something.

Last Updated: March 22, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate the lack of willingness to perform a specific action. It is often followed by a verb.

Examples:

She showed unwillingness to participate in the project.
His unwillingness to compromise caused tension in the negotiation.
Their unwillingness to listen to advice led to their failure.
The manager's unwillingness to adapt to change hindered progress.
The child's unwillingness to share his toys upset his friends.

Alternatives:

reluctance to
resistance to
disinclination to
dislike of
aversion to

This phrase is used to indicate the unwillingness that is inherent in a person or thing. It is often followed by a noun or pronoun.

Examples:

The unwillingness of the employees to work overtime was evident.
The unwillingness of the cat to take a bath was clear from its hissing.
The unwillingness of the government to compromise led to a stalemate.
The unwillingness of the students to participate in the activity was disappointing.
The unwillingness of the dog to leave the park was amusing.

Alternatives:

reluctance of
resistance of
disinclination of
dislike of
aversion of

Answer 1

unwillingness to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when expressing the lack of willingness to do something.

Answer 2

unwillingness of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when referring to the unwillingness possessed by someone or something.

"unwillingness to" vs "unwillingness of"

unwillingness to

unwillingness of

Related Comparisons