"impatience of" vs "husband's impatience"

Question

"impatience of" vs "husband's impatience"

Both "husband's impatience" and "impatience of" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Husband's impatience" is used when referring to the impatience of a specific husband, while "impatience of" is used when discussing impatience in a more general or abstract sense.

Last Updated: March 19, 2024

This phrase is used to talk about impatience in a broader context, not specifically tied to a particular individual. It is more general and abstract.

Examples:

The impatience of youth is well-known.
She couldn't stand the impatience of the crowd waiting for the concert to start.

Alternatives:

youth's impatience
the impatience displayed by the crowd
the impatience that people show
the impatience characteristic of children
the impatience inherent in the situation

This phrase is used to describe the impatience exhibited by a particular husband. It indicates that the impatience belongs to that specific individual.

Examples:

I can't stand my husband's impatience when he's waiting in line.
Her husband's impatience often leads to arguments between them.

Alternatives:

my husband's impatience
the impatience of my husband
the impatience displayed by her husband
the impatience that her husband shows
the impatience characteristic of her husband

Answer 1

impatience of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when discussing impatience in a more general or abstract sense.

Answer 2

husband's impatience

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when referring to the impatience of a specific husband.

"impatience of" vs "husband's impatience"

impatience of

husband's impatience

Related Comparisons