"lead to" vs "trigger a disaster"

Question

"lead to" vs "trigger a disaster"

Both phrases are correct, but they have slightly different meanings and contexts. 'Trigger a disaster' implies causing a disaster to happen, while 'lead to' suggests a sequence of events that result in a disaster. They are comparable in the sense that they both relate to the occurrence of a disaster, but the choice between them depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

This phrase means to result in or cause something to happen, often as a consequence of a series of events.

Examples:

The heavy rain led to flooding in the area.
Poor communication can lead to misunderstandings.

Alternatives:

result in
cause
bring about
culminate in
contribute to

This phrase means to cause a disaster to happen or to set off a chain of events that result in a disaster.

Examples:

The earthquake triggered a disaster in the region.
The faulty wiring triggered a disaster at the factory.

Alternatives:

cause a disaster
spark a disaster
set off a disaster
precipitate a disaster
bring about a disaster

Answer 1

lead to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

trigger a disaster

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"lead to" vs "trigger a disaster"

lead to

trigger a disaster

Related Comparisons