"to no avail" vs "to no benefit"

Question

"to no avail" vs "to no benefit"

Both "to no avail" and "to no benefit" are correct phrases, but they are used in different contexts. "To no avail" is used to indicate that something was unsuccessful or ineffective, while "to no benefit" is used to suggest that there was no advantage or gain from a particular action.

Last Updated: March 19, 2024

This phrase is used to express that an effort or action did not achieve the desired result or was futile.

Examples:

He tried to fix the broken vase, but to no avail.
She searched for hours, but her efforts were to no avail.
The team worked hard, but their attempts were to no avail.

Alternatives:

in vain
without success
fruitlessly
unsuccessfully
ineffectively

This phrase is used to convey that a specific action did not result in any benefit or advantage.

Examples:

The extra training provided to the employees was to no benefit.
His attempts to negotiate were to no benefit.
The investment in the project was to no benefit.

Alternatives:

without benefit
without advantage
with no gain
with no advantage
with no benefit

Answer 1

to no avail

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate that something was unsuccessful or ineffective.

Answer 2

to no benefit

This phrase is correct but less commonly used in English. It is used to suggest that there was no advantage or gain from a particular action.

"to no avail" vs "to no benefit"

to no avail

to no benefit

Related Comparisons