⚡ Black Friday Offer: Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

There were no significant difference vs There was no significant difference

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'There were no significant differences' is used when referring to multiple differences, while 'There was no significant difference' is used when talking about a single difference. The choice between the two depends on whether you are discussing a singular or plural concept.

Last updated: March 27, 2024 • 1814 views

There were no significant difference

This phrase is correct when referring to multiple differences.

This phrase is used when discussing multiple differences that were not significant.

Examples:

  • In the study, there were no significant differences between the two groups.
  • There were no significant difference in mean temperature increase between skin-to-sin cared-for and incubator cared-for infants. Blood glucose increase was ...
  • There were no significant difference between the intervention and control patients in terms of PF, symptoms, health services utilization, or medication use ...
  • We have found that there were no significant difference in the operative and postoperative blood pressure and plasma volume control among the three groups.
  • Nov 11, 2020 ... For planned births in freestanding midwifery units and alongside midwifery there were no significant difference in adverse perinatal outcomes ...
  • At baseline, there were no significant difference in HOAs in both SH- and NaCl-treated eyes [25]. HOA was measured over 2 h after SH or NaCl instillation ...
  • There were no significant difference in their values. Table 1. Demography for both groups E and M (endoscopy and microdiscectomy) and preop values for ODI ...
  • Results: There were no significant difference in PLC before RT between. HRFT group (1.60 0.57) and CRFT group (1.56 0.52) (pre-PLC;. tZ0.981, pZ0.327). The ...
  • There were no significant difference regarding age, gender, days from contact to illness, days from illness to admit between second-generation cases and ...
  • Finally, there were no significant difference in the degree of perineal tear between groups. The Colombian RCT found no significant differences between ...
  • ... There were no significant difference in wrist and chest average heart rates between walking, jogging, and the arm ergometer. There was a significant ...

Alternatives:

  • There were no significant variations
  • There were no significant discrepancies
  • There were no significant disparities
  • There were no significant distinctions
  • There were no significant divergences

There was no significant difference

This phrase is correct when referring to a single difference.

This phrase is used when discussing a single difference that was not significant.

Examples:

  • There was no significant difference in the test results.

Alternatives:

  • There was no significant variation
  • There was no significant discrepancy
  • There was no significant disparity
  • There was no significant distinction
  • There was no significant divergence

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

⚡️ Black Friday 2024 ⚡️

Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!