"i dunno." vs "The vitamins in junk food are deficient to fruit."

Question

"i dunno." vs "The vitamins in junk food are deficient to fruit."

These two phrases are not comparable as they are completely different in nature. The first phrase attempts to compare the vitamin content in junk food and fruit, while the second phrase is a casual expression of uncertainty. They serve different purposes and cannot be evaluated against each other.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

You can use 'I dunno' as a casual way to say 'I don't know' in informal conversations or when you are unsure about something.

Alternatives:

I don't know.
Not sure.
I have no idea.
I'm clueless.
I'm not certain.

If you want to compare the vitamin content of junk food and fruit, you could say 'The vitamins in junk food are lower than those in fruit.'

Alternatives:

The vitamins in junk food are lower than those in fruit.
Fruit contains more vitamins than junk food.
Junk food lacks the vitamins found in fruit.
The vitamin content in fruit is superior to that in junk food.
Fruit is a better source of vitamins compared to junk food.

Answer 1

i dunno.

This phrase is correct and commonly used in informal situations to express uncertainty or lack of knowledge.

Answer 2

The vitamins in junk food are deficient to fruit.

This phrase is not correct. The comparison is unclear and the use of 'deficient to' is not appropriate in this context.

"i dunno." vs "The vitamins in junk food are deficient to fruit."

i dunno.

The vitamins in junk food are deficient to fruit.

Related Comparisons