"junk food is nutrient poor" vs "junk food is poor in nutrition"

Question

"junk food is nutrient poor" vs "junk food is poor in nutrition"

Both phrases are correct and convey the same meaning. They are interchangeable and can be used depending on personal preference or style. There is no significant difference in meaning or correctness between the two.

Last Updated: March 26, 2024

This phrase means that junk food lacks essential nutrients. It is a concise way to describe the nutritional quality of junk food.

Examples:

The doctor advised me to avoid junk food because it is nutrient poor.
Nutritionists often warn about the dangers of consuming nutrient poor foods.

Alternatives:

junk food is poor in nutrition
junk food lacks nutrients
junk food is nutritionally deficient
junk food is lacking in nutrients
junk food has low nutritional value

This phrase also means that junk food lacks essential nutrients. It is a slightly different way to express the same idea about the nutritional content of junk food.

Examples:

It is well-known that junk food is poor in nutrition.
Parents should limit their children's intake of foods that are poor in nutrition.

Alternatives:

junk food is nutrient poor
junk food lacks nutrients
junk food is nutritionally deficient
junk food is lacking in nutrients
junk food has low nutritional value

Answer 1

junk food is nutrient poor

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

junk food is poor in nutrition

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"junk food is nutrient poor" vs "junk food is poor in nutrition"

junk food is nutrient poor

junk food is poor in nutrition

Related Comparisons