the study showed that vs the study demonstrated that

Both phrases, 'the study showed that' and 'the study demonstrated that,' are correct and commonly used in English. They can be used interchangeably to indicate a study's results or findings.

Explained by Gregg
Editor at TextRanch

Last updated: March 22, 2025 • 4219 views

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to introduce findings or results from a study.

"the study showed that"

This phrase is used to present the outcomes or conclusions of a study. It is commonly followed by a statement summarizing the results.

Examples:

The study showed that there was a significant correlation between the two variables.
The study showed that the new treatment was effective in reducing symptoms.
The study showed that there was no significant difference between the control group and the experimental group.

Show examples from the web [+]

Results from the study showed that this structured lifestyle change program, in which participants achieved weight loss of 5 to 7 percent of their body ...
Apr 24, 2014 ... While the study showed that walking benefited creative brainstorming, it did not have a positive effect on the kind of focused thinking ...

Alternatives:

the study demonstrated that
the study indicated that
the study revealed that
the study found that
the study concluded that

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to introduce findings or results from a study.

"the study demonstrated that"

This phrase is used to present the outcomes or conclusions of a study. It is commonly followed by a statement summarizing the results.

Examples:

The study demonstrated that there was a clear link between the two variables.
The study demonstrated that the intervention led to a significant improvement in outcomes.
The study demonstrated that the hypothesis was supported by the data.

Show examples from the web [+]

The authors of the study demonstrated that resistant genes can spread to humans through foodstuffs, direct contact with animals and exposure to contaminated water sources.
In addition, the study demonstrated that, whenever any persistent organic pollutant pesticides were detected in wastes, their concentrations were usually high when compared with the proposed concentration limits.
The studies demonstrated that Vaxxitek HVT+IBD is effective in the active immunisation of chickens and chicks in the egg against Infectious Bursal disease.
The studies demonstrated that Equilis StrepE is effective in the active immunisation of horses from 4 months of age against Streptococcus equi to reduce clinical signs and occurrence of lymph node abscesses.
The studies demonstrated that the 50 mg dose did not have a relevant benefit and the 300 mg dose did not show better efficacy than the 100 mg dose.
The MAH concluded that the studies demonstrated that gemcitabine plus carboplatin is superior to 12 carboplatin in terms of time to disease progression (TtDP) and response rate in patients with platinum- sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.
In addition the VALIANT study demonstrated that mortality was not increased in patients receiving the triple combination.
The ECVAM validation study demonstrated that both tests were able to reliably discriminate between known skin corrosives and non-corrosives.
The CEPT studies also demonstrated that ultra-wide band equipment may be used under more stringent conditions than the generic limits in automotive and railway vehicles.
There were no food restrictions in the studies that demonstrated the efficacy and safety of CELSENTRI (see section 5.1).
The above mentioned study has demonstrated that:
The CHMP considered the VALIANT study which demonstrated that valsartan given as monotherapy is at least as effective as captopril given as monotherapy in the reduction of total mortality after an acute myocardial infarction.
Clinical studies demonstrated that the immune responses and the safety profiles of the administered vaccines were unaffected.
Preclinical animal studies demonstrated that nephrotoxicity was the major dose-limiting toxicity of cidofovir.
In humans, studies demonstrated that valdecoxib metabolism is predominantly mediated via CYP3A4 and 2C9 isozymes.
In vitro studies demonstrated that vildagliptin does not inhibit/induce CYP 450 enzymes.
A mass balance study demonstrated that > 90% of the dose was excreted within 24 hours.
In vitro studies demonstrated that neither oseltamivir nor the active metabolite is a substrate for, or an inhibitor of, the major cytochrome P450 isoforms.
Cognitive investigations in clinical pharmacology studies demonstrated that rimonabant is devoid of
In vitro studies demonstrated that pravastatin is transported into hepatocytes and with substantially less intake in other cells.

Alternatives:

the study showed that
the study indicated that
the study revealed that
the study found that
the study concluded that

How TextRanch works

Fast and reliable proofreading, editing, and language advice tailored to your needs.

1. Choose Your Service

Quick Text Editing

Emails and short texts
Proofreading & editing
Ready in 5-10 minutes

SUBMIT YOUR TEXT NOW

Document Editing

Documents of any type (*.docx)
Advanced & Premium editing
Ready in as little as 4 hours

UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT

Ask an Editor

Personalized answers to your language questions
Expert guidance on grammar, style, and usage
Ready in 24 hours

ASK YOUR QUESTION

Upload your document or paste your text directly into our platform. Your text is reviewed and refined by our expert editors (real people, not machines) who understand the nuances of English. Expect corrections, improvements, and insightful suggestions that enhance the clarity, tone, and professionalism of your writing.

3. Receive Your Polished Text

In just a few minutes (or hours for longer documents), you'll receive your corrected text. Review the changes, make any final adjustments, and confidently share your polished English with the world.
You can count on a personalized, friendly service every time you use TextRanch. We're committed to helping you make a great impression with every word you write.

We proofread and edit these types of texts and documents:

Short texts Business Emails Personal Emails Social media posts Resume and Curriculum Vitae Business documents Sales proposal Research and academic papers Thesis Dissertation Essays Articles Blog posts and much more....

Our Customers Love Us!

We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283125 votes, and

4.9 Excellent - Reviews 2.137

"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"

Zubair
from Bangladesh

"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"

Arturo
from Mexico

"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."

Selena
from USA

"Wow, it's just so excellent. I never would have believed I could have a sure and excellent English companion. Thanks, TextRanch."

Ifiok
from Nigeria

"This is my first time using TextRanch, and I like how the editors take time to correct my text. To everyone who has never used TextRanch before, I highly recommend trying it."

Wilson
from France

"It is an amazing source of feedback because, as a non-native speaker, I really need to have a reliable helper correct my text."

Susan
from Germany

the study showed that vs the study demonstrated that

"the study showed that"

"the study demonstrated that"

Related Comparisons

2. Submit Your Text

3. Receive Your Polished Text