TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

the study showed that vs the study demonstrated that

Both phrases, 'the study showed that' and 'the study demonstrated that,' are correct and commonly used in English. They are interchangeable and can be used to introduce findings or results from a study.

Last updated: March 26, 2024 • 3973 views

the study showed that

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to introduce findings or results from a study.

This phrase is used to present the outcomes or conclusions of a study. It is commonly followed by a statement summarizing the results.

Examples:

The study showed that there was a significant correlation between the two variables.
The study showed that the new treatment was effective in reducing symptoms.
The study showed that there was no significant difference between the control group and the experimental group.

Show examples from the web [+]

Results from the study showed that this structured lifestyle change program, in which participants achieved weight loss of 5 to 7 percent of their body ...
Apr 24, 2014 ... While the study showed that walking benefited creative brainstorming, it did not have a positive effect on the kind of focused thinking ...

Alternatives:

the study demonstrated that
the study indicated that
the study revealed that
the study found that
the study concluded that

the study demonstrated that

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to introduce findings or results from a study.

This phrase is used to present the outcomes or conclusions of a study. It is commonly followed by a statement summarizing the results.

Examples:

The study demonstrated that there was a clear link between the two variables.
The study demonstrated that the intervention led to a significant improvement in outcomes.
The study demonstrated that the hypothesis was supported by the data.

Show examples from the web [+]

The authors of the study demonstrated that resistant genes can spread to humans through foodstuffs, direct contact with animals and exposure to contaminated water sources.
In addition, the study demonstrated that, whenever any persistent organic pollutant pesticides were detected in wastes, their concentrations were usually high when compared with the proposed concentration limits.
The studies demonstrated that Vaxxitek HVT+IBD is effective in the active immunisation of chickens and chicks in the egg against Infectious Bursal disease.
The studies demonstrated that Equilis StrepE is effective in the active immunisation of horses from 4 months of age against Streptococcus equi to reduce clinical signs and occurrence of lymph node abscesses.
The studies demonstrated that the 50 mg dose did not have a relevant benefit and the 300 mg dose did not show better efficacy than the 100 mg dose.
The MAH concluded that the studies demonstrated that gemcitabine plus carboplatin is superior to 12 carboplatin in terms of time to disease progression (TtDP) and response rate in patients with platinum- sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.
In addition the VALIANT study demonstrated that mortality was not increased in patients receiving the triple combination.
The ECVAM validation study demonstrated that both tests were able to reliably discriminate between known skin corrosives and non-corrosives.
The CEPT studies also demonstrated that ultra-wide band equipment may be used under more stringent conditions than the generic limits in automotive and railway vehicles.
There were no food restrictions in the studies that demonstrated the efficacy and safety of CELSENTRI (see section 5.1).
The above mentioned study has demonstrated that:
The CHMP considered the VALIANT study which demonstrated that valsartan given as monotherapy is at least as effective as captopril given as monotherapy in the reduction of total mortality after an acute myocardial infarction.
Clinical studies demonstrated that the immune responses and the safety profiles of the administered vaccines were unaffected.
Preclinical animal studies demonstrated that nephrotoxicity was the major dose-limiting toxicity of cidofovir.
In humans, studies demonstrated that valdecoxib metabolism is predominantly mediated via CYP3A4 and 2C9 isozymes.
In vitro studies demonstrated that vildagliptin does not inhibit/induce CYP 450 enzymes.
A mass balance study demonstrated that > 90% of the dose was excreted within 24 hours.
In vitro studies demonstrated that neither oseltamivir nor the active metabolite is a substrate for, or an inhibitor of, the major cytochrome P450 isoforms.
Cognitive investigations in clinical pharmacology studies demonstrated that rimonabant is devoid of
In vitro studies demonstrated that pravastatin is transported into hepatocytes and with substantially less intake in other cells.

Alternatives:

the study showed that
the study indicated that
the study revealed that
the study found that
the study concluded that

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9).

"Thank you!"
Sachi Nakama July 2024
"I have literally been through chat, PI, claude, bard and bing and I got conflicting answers! Thank you! Human intelligence reigns!"
Retha July 2024
"Faster than AI"
CYNTHIA December 2023
"This was very helpful and I personally think this site is the best."
Kaden October 2023
"It was extremely thorough and very helpful!"
imperialelisa October 2023
"7 years without any disappointment. Always 100% satisfied. You guys are the best in the world at what you do. Thank you so much :)"
Zubair Alam October 2023
"In a world of text messages and online communication, this is great to have as a live tool. Thank you."
Selena October 2023
"Without textranch I would be stuck!"
宏祐 October 2023
"Accuracy and fast response. Personal comments from editor. Thank you."
Clh September 2023
"I wasn't aware of this service, it's fascinating and more reliable than standard IA tools available on the internet"
Arturo September 2023
"The fact that you can get reliable fast feedback on your texts."
Vinicius Antonio August 2023
"you guys are better than grammarly i'm being honest here"
ordinary July 2023
"OMG! This is really good than any other text correction tools I've used so far. Highly recommend this."
Vehan July 2023
"Very fast and accurate. thank you."
mojtaba July 2023
"I love this app because it's help to writing skills all of students ♥️"
Tarisini July 2023
"This was exactly the mistake I was looking for, the wording dind´t sound right at first. Better than grammarly!"
Ente July 2023
"The immediate help that I received was reassuring and very satisfactory. Thanks."
priiiyanshuu July 2023
"this helps A LOT for my studies."
kathnunez02 June 2023
"Woow!! I would never have expected such precision! Thank you soooo much!!"
Berta June 2023
"Real Time Editor and not AI. Many Thanks."
Priya June 2023
"The very first thing excites me about Textranch is how much your editors care."
sepideh June 2023
"The fact that texts are checked by human editors rather than by AI, etc. I appreciate this!"
Анна June 2023
"Feel welcome, immediate response, high quality feedback"
martin.roy June 2023
"This is the best app that I have ever seen"
Burulai May 2023

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!