the analysis showed that vs the analysis showed

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'The analysis showed that' is used when you want to introduce the results or findings of the analysis. 'The analysis showed' can be used when the context makes it clear what the analysis showed.

Last updated: March 28, 2024 • 1211 views

the analysis showed that

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to introduce the results or findings of an analysis.

Use 'the analysis showed that' when you want to explicitly state the results or findings of the analysis. Follow 'that' with the specific information revealed by the analysis.

Examples:

The analysis showed that there was a significant correlation between the two variables.
The analysis showed that the new marketing strategy was effective.
The analysis showed that the data was inconclusive.

Show examples from the web [+]

The analysis showed that the majority of these imports were genuine Singaporean origin.
The analysis showed that export prices were significantly lower than those of the Community industry both with and without the applicable anti-dumping duty.
The analysis showed that the export sales to unrelated parties made by the cooperating Union producer represented an important part of their total sales (around 30 %).
The analysis showed that the export sales to unrelated parties made by the four representative Union producers represented an important part of their sales (around 26 %) during the period considered.
(88) The analysis showed that export prices were significantly lower than those of the Community industry both with and without the applicable anti-dumping duty.
The analysis showed that the profit and mark-up made on its imports are such that the imposition of measures indeed could lead to a decrease in its profitability.
However, the analysis showed that its data on import volumes exceeded by far the volumes recorded in other available sources, in particular in the Article 14(6) database.
As explained in recital 21 of the provisional Regulation, in the case of Turkey, the analysis showed that the Turkish domestic market was very limited.
Austria argued that the results of the analysis showed that the decision by the Province of Burgenland was justified.
However, the analysis showed that while anti-dumping measures on citric acid originating in Canada were not in force during the IP, anti-dumping measures were in force during the IP on citric acid originating in Thailand.
The analysis showed that the export sales to unrelated parties made by the Community industry remained relatively modest (around 7 %) during the period considered.
The analysis showed that the mix of model types sold under certain product groupings have changed since the acceptance of the undertakings.
The analysis showed that the majority of these imports were of genuine Singaporean origin.
The analysis showed that patients with the YMDD mutation do not respond as well to treatment with Zeffix as those without the mutation.
The analysis showed that for the overall Community industry the above decrease in raw material costs represented around 23 % of total cost of production, or 21 % of sales price between 1996 and the IP.
The analysis showed that, even if a reduction in VAT is passed on in full in domestic prices, for the same budgetary cost a reduction in labour charges creates 52 % more jobs.
The analysis showed that in 2004, the increase in raw material costs was moderate as compared to the increase of these costs in 2005 and the IP.
The analysis showed that from 1996 up to 1999, the Community industry's export sales to third countries represented around 8 % of its total sales, whereas they rose to 15 % during the IP.

Alternatives:

The analysis revealed that
The analysis indicated that
The analysis demonstrated that
The analysis suggested that
The analysis concluded that