"should be replaced by" vs "should be replaced with"

Question

"should be replaced by" vs "should be replaced with"

Both "should be replaced with" and "should be replaced by" are correct and commonly used in English. The choice between the two depends on the context and the objects being replaced. There is no strict rule dictating the use of one over the other, so both can be used interchangeably.

Last Updated: March 17, 2024

This phrase is also used when indicating the replacement of one thing by another. It is suitable for various contexts and can be used interchangeably with "should be replaced with."

Examples:

The old carpet should be replaced by a new one.
The broken window should be replaced by a stronger glass.
The outdated software should be replaced by a more advanced version.

Alternatives:

should be substituted by
should be exchanged by
should be swapped by
should be traded by
should be interchanged by

This phrase is used when indicating the replacement of one thing with another. It is suitable for a wide range of contexts.

Examples:

The old carpet should be replaced with a new one.
The broken window should be replaced with a stronger glass.
The outdated software should be replaced with a more advanced version.

Alternatives:

should be substituted with
should be exchanged with
should be swapped with
should be traded with
should be interchanged with

Answer 1

should be replaced by

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

should be replaced with

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"should be replaced by" vs "should be replaced with"

should be replaced by

should be replaced with

Related Comparisons