Which one is correct?
"quality of life for" or "quality of life of"?

TextRanch: The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

100% Human-Powered Editing!

quality of life for

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used to describe the impact or effect on the well-being, happiness, and satisfaction of a particular group or individual.

Alternatives:

  • improving the quality of life for cancer patients
  • measures to enhance the quality of life for employees

quality of life of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

This phrase is used to describe the overall well-being, happiness, and satisfaction experienced by a particular group or individual.

Alternatives:

  • the quality of life of the elderly population
  • the quality of life of children in underprivileged communities
Both 'quality of life of' and 'quality of life for' are commonly used and correct. They can be used interchangeably depending on the context. 'Quality of life of' is more focused on describing the quality possessed by a particular group or individual, while 'quality of life for' emphasizes the impact on a group or individual.

Last Updated: March 19, 2024

Related Comparisons

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!