"quality of" vs "quality on"

Question

"quality of" vs "quality on"

Both "quality of" and "quality on" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Quality of" is used to describe the characteristics or attributes of something, while "quality on" is not a common phrase in English.

Last Updated: March 29, 2024

Use "quality of" when you want to talk about the characteristics or attributes of something. For example, "The quality of the product was excellent."

Examples:

The quality of the service was outstanding.
She was impressed by the quality of the presentation.
We need to improve the quality of our work.
The quality of the food was exceptional.
He always strives for the highest quality of work.

Alternatives:

standard of
level of
degree of
grade of
caliber of

Answer 1

quality of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to describe the characteristics or attributes of something.

Answer 2

quality on

This phrase is not commonly used in English. It does not convey a clear meaning and is not a standard expression.

"quality of" vs "quality on"

quality of

quality on

Related Comparisons