"at all levels" vs "on all levels"

Question

"at all levels" vs "on all levels"

Both 'on all levels' and 'at all levels' are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'On all levels' is commonly used to indicate that something is true or applies in every aspect or area, while 'at all levels' is used to refer to different degrees or stages of something.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate different degrees or stages of something. It can refer to various levels of hierarchy, proficiency, or intensity.

Examples:

We need to address the issue at all levels of the organization.
The company operates at all levels of the supply chain.
Her skills are evident at all levels of the game.
The problem needs to be solved at all levels - local, regional, and national.
The training program caters to employees at all levels of experience.

Alternatives:

across all levels
throughout all levels
at every level
in every aspect
in all degrees

This phrase is used to emphasize that something is true or valid in every aspect or area. It is often used to express completeness or comprehensiveness.

Examples:

This decision will have an impact on all levels of the organization.
She is a great leader on all levels - strategic, operational, and interpersonal.
The new policy needs to be implemented on all levels to be effective.
The benefits of the program extend on all levels - physical, mental, and emotional.
His talent shines through on all levels of performance.

Alternatives:

across all levels
in all aspects
throughout all levels
at every level
in every aspect

Answer 1

at all levels

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to refer to different degrees or stages of something.

Answer 2

on all levels

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate that something is true or applies in every aspect or area.

"at all levels" vs "on all levels"

at all levels

on all levels

Related Comparisons