"nowhere" vs "nowhere in the world"

Question

"nowhere" vs "nowhere in the world"

Both "nowhere in the world" and "nowhere" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Nowhere in the world" is used to emphasize that something does not exist or happen anywhere globally, while "nowhere" simply indicates the absence of a specific location.

Last Updated: March 24, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate the absence of a specific location or to emphasize that something is not present in any place. It is more general than "nowhere in the world."

Examples:

I searched everywhere, but he was nowhere to be found.
There is nowhere to hide in this room.
She felt like she belonged nowhere.
Nowhere is safe from cyber threats.
The treasure was hidden in the middle of nowhere.

Alternatives:

no place
not anywhere
not in any location
not in any place
not present anywhere

This phrase is used to emphasize that something does not exist or happen anywhere in the world. It is often used to stress the universality of a statement or situation.

Examples:

Nowhere in the world can you find a more beautiful sunset than in Santorini.
This disease has spread to nowhere in the world.
Nowhere in the world is safe from the effects of climate change.
Nowhere in the world are people more welcoming than in Ireland.
Nowhere in the world can match the cultural diversity of New York City.

Alternatives:

nowhere on earth
nowhere globally
nowhere internationally
nowhere around the world
nowhere in any country

Answer 1

nowhere

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate the absence of a specific location.

Answer 2

nowhere in the world

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to emphasize the absence of something globally.

"nowhere" vs "nowhere in the world"

nowhere

nowhere in the world

Related Comparisons