"no emails were received" vs "no emails received"

Question

"no emails were received" vs "no emails received"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "No emails received" is a shorter, more informal way of expressing the idea that no emails were received. On the other hand, "No emails were received" is a more formal and complete way of stating the same thing.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

This phrase is a more formal and complete way of saying that no emails were received. It is suitable for formal written communication or professional settings.

Examples:

No emails were received during the outage.
No emails were received by the deadline.

Alternatives:

No emails have been received
There were no emails received

This phrase is a shorter, more informal way of saying that no emails were received. It is commonly used in casual conversations or informal written communication.

Examples:

No emails received today.
Sorry, no emails received from them yet.

Alternatives:

No emails came in
No emails arrived

Answer 1

no emails were received

This phrase is correct and commonly used in formal contexts.

Answer 2

no emails received

This phrase is correct and commonly used in informal contexts.

"no emails were received" vs "no emails received"

no emails were received

no emails received

Related Comparisons