"Not receive" vs "not received"

Question

"Not receive" vs "not received"

Both "not received" and "not receive" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Not received" is the past participle form and is used when referring to something that has not been received in the past. On the other hand, "not receive" is the base form and is used when talking about present or future actions.

Last Updated: March 27, 2024

Use "not receive" when you want to indicate that something is not received in the present or future. It is often used in instructions, commands, or general statements.

Examples:

If you do not receive a confirmation email, please contact customer service.
I will not receive any visitors today.
The system will not receive any updates until next week.

Alternatives:

will not receive
do not receive
does not receive
not going to receive
not receiving

Use "not received" when you want to indicate that something was not received in the past. It is often used in formal communication or written correspondence.

Examples:

The package was not received by the recipient.
The payment was not received on time.
The email was not received by the intended recipient.

Alternatives:

was not received
has not been received
had not received
had not been received
have not received

Answer 1

Not receive

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English. It is the base form and is used when talking about present or future actions.

Answer 2

not received

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English. It is the past participle form and is used when referring to something that has not been received in the past.

"Not receive" vs "not received"

Not receive

not received

Related Comparisons