🎁 A holiday package to celebrate the season! Click here and shop now!

TextRanch

The best way to perfect your writing.

Discover why 1,062,726 users count on TextRanch to get their English corrected!

1. Input your text below.
2. Get it corrected in a few minutes by our editors.
3. Improve your English!

One of our experts will correct your English.

Our experts

no cost vs no-cost

Both "no cost" and "no-cost" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "No cost" is used to indicate that something is free or without charge, while "no-cost" is used as an adjective to describe something that does not incur any cost.

Last updated: March 27, 2024 • 1672 views

no cost

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate that something is free or without charge.

Use "no cost" when you want to convey that something does not require payment or is free of charge.

Examples:

  • The event is open to all at no cost.
  • There is no cost associated with the trial period.
  • That's how hard it was to come by, and of course a few decades later, a chemist by the name of Charles Martin Hall developed a way to extract aluminum from common dirt at almost no cost, and just like that,
  • The owner should incur no cost.
  • Using your existing mainframe for time-sharing, there's no cost to you.
  • It involves no machines, no sweat, no cost, and is big news for those of us who spend too much time on our backsides.
  • But if it is necessary to obtain the freedom of our people... then no cost could be too great to achieve that goal.
  • No cost for content on the other 499?
  • There's no cost to the student.
  • There is no cost too high.
  • There is no cost to the user.
  • This would allow services to be enhanced with no cost in terms of passenger safety.
  • When it came forward two years ago there was no cost impact assessment attached.
  • Consequently, no cost of this type were incurred in 2008.
  • In addition, there is no cost saving accruing from the extension of the network.
  • Moreover, no cost analysis was undertaken comparing the ZT's costs with those of a typical well run undertaking.
  • And if there is no cost to Corrigan's actions, many of my people will feel betrayed.
  • My group agrees, on condition that in these codes the guiding principle should be that there is no cost attached to compulsory conversion.
  • Now, I know a great mechanic who can check out your wheels, no cost to you.
  • Therefore, since we do not actually have to use that guarantee, there is ultimately no cost to the European budget.
  • Every effort was made, no cost was spared; perhaps we just ran out of steam.
  • The global capital will simply move to where there is no cost for emitting CO2.

Alternatives:

  • free of charge
  • at no charge
  • without cost
  • complimentary

no-cost

This phrase is correct and used as an adjective to describe something that does not incur any cost.

Use "no-cost" before a noun to describe something that is provided without any charge or cost.

Examples:

  • The company offers a no-cost consultation service.
  • The program provides no-cost training sessions.
  • Partners in the project registered and established in third countries may participate in projects on a no-cost basis, except in the case of international governmental organisations.
  • Actions may include partners and participants from countries of return on a no-cost basis from the Commission.
  • In some countries, like Finland, the applicant authority does not have to pay as no-cost rule is applied, but in many countries this is not the case.
  • No matter how you do that, you're not going to start with a 100,000-dollar instrument and bring it down to no-cost. It isn't going to work.
  • I've personally put out several local fires at no cost to the taxpayer.
  • All at no cost to you, obviously.
  • No cost is too high for justice.
  • There's no cost to the student.
  • There is no cost too high.
  • Whitechapel's carpenters and builders lend their skill at no cost.
  • Incentivise green housing with no cost for the State.
  • The owner should incur no cost.
  • There is no cost to the user.
  • No cost analysis has been carried out.
  • This would allow services to be enhanced with no cost in terms of passenger safety.
  • Surpluses can be sent instantaneously at almost no cost anywhere.
  • When it came forward two years ago there was no cost impact assessment attached.
  • Electricity prices have risen even though the allowances were distributed at no cost.
  • Consequently, no cost of this type were incurred in 2008.
  • Moreover, the results of the research should be available to interested undertakings at no costs.

Alternatives:

  • free
  • complimentary
  • without charge
  • cost-free

Related Comparisons

What Our Customers Are Saying

Our customers love us! We have an average rating of 4.79 stars based on 283,125 votes.
Also check out our 2,100+ reviews on TrustPilot (4.9TextRanch on TrustPilot).

Why choose TextRanch?

Lowest prices
Up to 50% lower than other online editing sites.

Fastest Times
Our team of editors is working for you 24/7.

Qualified Editors
Native English experts for UK or US English.

Top Customer Service
We are here to help. Satisfaction guaranteed!

×

💝 TextRanch Holidays Offer! 💝️

25% special discount
Stock up on credits for the entire year!

Grab this offer now!