"at no cost" vs "with no cost"

Question

"at no cost" vs "with no cost"

Both 'with no cost' and 'at no cost' are correct phrases in English, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'At no cost' is more commonly used to indicate that something is free or without charge, while 'with no cost' can also be used but is less common. The choice between the two depends on personal preference and the specific context in which they are used.

Last Updated: March 31, 2024

This phrase is used to emphasize that something is provided without requiring payment. It is often used in marketing, promotions, and offers to highlight that there is no expense involved.

Examples:

You can get the service at no cost.
The tickets are available at no cost.
The company offers a trial version of the software at no cost.
The event is open to the public at no cost.
The webinar provides valuable information at no cost.

Alternatives:

free of charge
without cost
without charge
complimentary
for free

This phrase is used to indicate that something does not require payment or has no associated cost. It can be used in various contexts to emphasize that there is no expense involved.

Examples:

The software can be downloaded with no cost.
The event is open to the public with no cost for admission.
You can access the information online with no cost.
The service is provided with no cost to the user.
The trial version allows you to use the product with no cost.

Alternatives:

at no cost
free of charge
without cost
without charge
complimentary

Answer 1

at no cost

This phrase is commonly used to indicate that something is free or without charge. It is a more popular choice than 'with no cost'.

Answer 2

with no cost

This phrase is correct but less commonly used than 'at no cost'. It means that something is free or without charge.

"at no cost" vs "with no cost"

at no cost

with no cost

Related Comparisons