"mitigate the results" vs "mitigate the ramifications"

Question

"mitigate the results" vs "mitigate the ramifications"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Mitigate the ramifications' is used when referring to reducing the negative consequences or effects of something, while 'mitigate the results' is not commonly used in this context. It is important to use 'mitigate the ramifications' when discussing the lessening of negative outcomes.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

Alternatives:

mitigate the ramifications
lessen the consequences
reduce the impact
minimize the effects
alleviate the repercussions

This phrase is used when you want to express the idea of lessening the negative impacts or consequences of a particular action or event.

Examples:

The company took steps to mitigate the ramifications of the data breach.
Efforts are being made to mitigate the ramifications of climate change.
It is important to mitigate the ramifications of a poorly planned project.

Alternatives:

lessen the consequences
reduce the impact
minimize the effects
alleviate the repercussions
diminish the fallout

Answer 1

mitigate the results

This phrase is not commonly used in English when referring to reducing the negative consequences or effects of something.

Answer 2

mitigate the ramifications

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to reducing the negative consequences or effects of something.

"mitigate the results" vs "mitigate the ramifications"

mitigate the results

mitigate the ramifications

Related Comparisons