"mentioned to" vs "mentioned with"

Question

"mentioned to" vs "mentioned with"

Both 'mentioned with' and 'mentioned to' are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Mentioned with' is used when referring to someone or something that was mentioned together with another person or thing. 'Mentioned to' is used when indicating the recipient of the mention.

Last Updated: March 28, 2024

This phrase is used when indicating the recipient of the mention. For example, 'She was mentioned to the manager as a potential candidate.'

Examples:

The issue was mentioned to the team during the meeting.
He was mentioned to the authorities as a witness.
The plan was mentioned to the board of directors.
She was mentioned to her teacher for her outstanding performance.
The complaint was mentioned to the customer service representative.

Alternatives:

mentioned for
mentioned as
brought up to
referred to
talked about to

This phrase is used when referring to someone or something that was mentioned together with another person or thing. For example, 'She was mentioned with admiration in the article.'

Examples:

He was mentioned with his colleagues in the report.
The new project was mentioned with excitement during the meeting.
The book was mentioned with other classics in the discussion.
She was mentioned with pride by her parents.
The company was mentioned with approval by the investors.

Alternatives:

mentioned alongside
mentioned in conjunction with
mentioned together with
mentioned in the same breath as
mentioned in the context of

Answer 1

mentioned to

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

mentioned with

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"mentioned to" vs "mentioned with"

mentioned to

mentioned with

Related Comparisons