"acknowledged on" vs "acknowledged with"

Question

"acknowledged on" vs "acknowledged with"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Acknowledged on' is used when referring to a specific date or occasion when something was acknowledged, while 'acknowledged with' is used when mentioning the method or means by which something was acknowledged.

Last Updated: March 28, 2024

This phrase is used when referring to a specific date or occasion when something was acknowledged. It indicates the time or event when the acknowledgment took place.

Examples:

The report was acknowledged on May 15th.
She was acknowledged on her birthday for her achievements.
The payment was acknowledged on receipt.
He was acknowledged on his retirement after years of service.
The error was acknowledged on the next business day.

Alternatives:

recognized on
confirmed on
noted on
accepted on
appreciated on

This phrase is used when mentioning the method or means by which something was acknowledged. It indicates the way or manner in which the acknowledgment was made.

Examples:

She acknowledged the gift with a smile.
He acknowledged the applause with a wave.
The team acknowledged the award with gratitude.
The student acknowledged the teacher's help with a thank-you note.
The company acknowledged the donation with a public statement.

Alternatives:

acknowledged by
acknowledged through
acknowledged via
acknowledged using
acknowledged through

Answer 1

acknowledged on

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

acknowledged with

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"acknowledged on" vs "acknowledged with"

acknowledged on

acknowledged with

Related Comparisons