"it might be gleaned from the article that mass media have both positive and negative influence to society." vs "it would be gleaned from the article that mass media have both positive and negative influence to society"

Question

"it might be gleaned from the article that mass media have both positive and negative influence to society." vs "it would be gleaned from the article that mass media have both positive and negative influence to society"

Both phrases are correct, but they differ in terms of certainty. The first phrase using 'would' implies a higher degree of certainty compared to the second phrase using 'might,' which suggests a lower level of certainty. The choice between the two depends on how confident the speaker is about the information being gleaned.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

This phrase is used when the speaker is less certain about the information being gleaned from the article.

This phrase is used when the speaker is more certain about the information being gleaned from the article.

Answer 1

it might be gleaned from the article that mass media have both positive and negative influence to society.

This phrase is correct and suggests a lower level of certainty about the information being gleaned.

Answer 2

it would be gleaned from the article that mass media have both positive and negative influence to society

This phrase is correct and implies a higher degree of certainty about the information being gleaned.

"it might be gleaned from the article that mass media have both positive and negative influence to society." vs "it would be gleaned from the article that mass media have both positive and negative influence to society"

it might be gleaned from the article that mass media have both positive and negative influence to society.

it would be gleaned from the article that mass media have both positive and negative influence to society

Related Comparisons