"It would be gleaned from the article that mass media have both positive and negative influence to society." vs "It could be gleaned from the article that mass media have both positive and negative influence to society."

Question

"It would be gleaned from the article that mass media have both positive and negative influence to society." vs "It could be gleaned from the article that mass media have both positive and negative influence to society."

Both phrases are correct, but they differ in terms of the level of certainty conveyed. The use of 'could' in the first phrase suggests a possibility or likelihood, while 'would' in the second phrase indicates a higher degree of certainty. The choice between them depends on how confident the speaker is about the information being gleaned.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

This phrase is used when the speaker wants to convey a higher level of certainty about the information being gleaned from the article.

This phrase is used when the speaker wants to suggest a possibility or likelihood of the information being gleaned from the article.

Answer 1

It would be gleaned from the article that mass media have both positive and negative influence to society.

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English. 'Would' implies a higher degree of certainty compared to 'could'.

Answer 2

It could be gleaned from the article that mass media have both positive and negative influence to society.

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English. 'Could' implies a possibility or likelihood of the information being gleaned.

"It would be gleaned from the article that mass media have both positive and negative influence to society." vs "It could be gleaned from the article that mass media have both positive and negative influence to society."

It would be gleaned from the article that mass media have both positive and negative influence to society.

It could be gleaned from the article that mass media have both positive and negative influence to society.

Related Comparisons