"ignored over a period of" vs "ignored on a time scale of"

Question

"ignored over a period of" vs "ignored on a time scale of"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Ignored over a period of' is commonly used to indicate being disregarded or not given attention throughout a specific duration of time. On the other hand, 'ignored on a time scale of' is less common and may sound a bit more technical, referring to being disregarded within a specific timeframe.

Last Updated: March 19, 2024

This phrase is used to describe situations where something or someone has been consistently disregarded or not paid attention to over a certain period.

Examples:

The issue was ignored over a period of several months.
Her contributions were ignored over a period of years.
The warning signs were ignored over a period of time.

Alternatives:

ignored for a period of
ignored during a period of
ignored throughout a period of

This phrase is more suitable for technical or scientific contexts where a specific time scale or timeframe needs to be emphasized when describing something being ignored.

Examples:

The data was ignored on a time scale of one year.
The effects of the medication were ignored on a time scale of three months.
The changes in behavior were ignored on a time scale of weeks.

Alternatives:

ignored within a time frame of
ignored for a duration of
ignored during a time period of

Answer 1

ignored over a period of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate being disregarded or not given attention throughout a specific duration of time.

Answer 2

ignored on a time scale of

This phrase is correct but less commonly used in everyday language. It may sound more technical and is used to refer to being disregarded within a specific timeframe.

"ignored over a period of" vs "ignored on a time scale of"

ignored over a period of

ignored on a time scale of

Related Comparisons