"for a period of" vs "for a period totalling"

Question

"for a period of" vs "for a period totalling"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'For a period of' is more commonly used and versatile, suitable for various situations. 'For a period totalling' is less common and tends to be used when emphasizing the total duration of a period.

Last Updated: March 24, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate the duration of a specific period of time. It is versatile and can be used in various contexts.

Examples:

The contract is valid for a period of two years.
She studied abroad for a period of six months.
The store will be closed for a period of renovation.
The project is scheduled for a period of three weeks.
The warranty covers the product for a period of one year.

Alternatives:

for a duration of
for a time frame of
for a span of
for a length of
for a stretch of

This phrase is used to emphasize the total duration of a period. It is less commonly used compared to 'for a period of.'

Examples:

The training sessions lasted for a period totalling 40 hours.
The event spanned over a period totalling three days.
The research project required a period totalling six months.
The construction work took a period totalling two years.
The campaign ran for a period totalling one month.

Alternatives:

for a total period of
for a combined period of
for a cumulative period of
for a complete period of
for a whole period of

Answer 1

for a period of

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

for a period totalling

This phrase is correct but less common in English.

"for a period of" vs "for a period totalling"

for a period of

for a period totalling

Related Comparisons