"if we would receive" vs "if we would have received"

Question

"if we would receive" vs "if we would have received"

Both phrases are not correct in standard English. The correct phrasing should be 'if we had received' or 'if we were to receive.' The use of 'would' in the conditional clause is redundant and incorrect in this context.

Last Updated: March 25, 2024

The correct phrasing should be 'if we had received' to express a past unreal condition or 'if we were to receive' to express a future hypothetical condition.

Alternatives:

if we had received
if we were to receive

The correct phrasing should be 'if we had received' to express a past unreal condition or 'if we were to receive' to express a future hypothetical condition.

Alternatives:

if we had received
if we were to receive

Answer 1

if we would receive

This phrase is not correct in standard English.

Answer 2

if we would have received

This phrase is not correct in standard English.

"if we would receive" vs "if we would have received"

if we would receive

if we would have received

Related Comparisons