"I was occupied in" vs "I was occupied in NASA"

Question

"I was occupied in" vs "I was occupied in NASA"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'I was occupied in' is a general statement indicating that someone was busy or engaged in something. 'I was occupied in NASA' specifies a particular place or organization where the person was busy. The addition of 'NASA' provides more specific information.

Last Updated: March 21, 2024

This phrase is used to express that someone was busy or engaged in a particular activity or task without specifying the exact location or organization.

Examples:

I was occupied in preparing for the exam.
She was occupied in writing her novel.
He was occupied in fixing the car.
They were occupied in discussing the project.
The team was occupied in planning the event.

Alternatives:

I was busy with
I was engaged in
I was involved in
I was immersed in
I was caught up in

This phrase is used when someone wants to specify that they were busy or engaged in tasks or projects related to a particular place or organization, in this case, NASA.

Alternatives:

I was working at NASA
I was involved with NASA
I was engaged in projects at NASA
I was occupied with NASA-related tasks
I was busy working for NASA

Answer 1

I was occupied in

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate being busy or engaged in something.

Answer 2

I was occupied in NASA

This phrase is correct and specifies that the person was busy or engaged in activities related to NASA.

"I was occupied in" vs "I was occupied in NASA"

I was occupied in

I was occupied in NASA

Related Comparisons