"I was born in" vs "I was born at"

Question

"I was born in" vs "I was born at"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'I was born in' is used to refer to the place or city where someone was born, while 'I was born at' is used to refer to a specific location within that place, such as a hospital or a house. Therefore, the choice between 'in' and 'at' depends on the level of detail you want to provide.

Last Updated: March 21, 2024

Use 'I was born in' followed by the name of the place or city to indicate the birth location.

Examples:

I was born in New York.
She was born in Paris.
He was born in a small town.

Alternatives:

I was born in the United States.
They were born in a hospital.
We were born in different countries.

Use 'I was born at' followed by the specific location, such as a hospital or a house, to provide more detail about the birth location.

Examples:

I was born at St. Mary's Hospital.
She was born at home.
He was born at the local clinic.

Alternatives:

I was born at the city hospital.
They were born at their grandparents' house.
We were born at different locations.

Answer 1

I was born in

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to refer to the place or city where someone was born.

Answer 2

I was born at

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to refer to a specific location within the place where someone was born.

"I was born in" vs "I was born at"

I was born in

I was born at

Related Comparisons