"I was angry at" vs "I was angry with"

Question

"I was angry at" vs "I was angry with"

Both 'I was angry at' and 'I was angry with' are correct phrases in English, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'I was angry at' is used when expressing anger towards a specific action or event, while 'I was angry with' is used when expressing anger towards a person.

Last Updated: March 15, 2024

Use 'I was angry at' when you want to express anger towards something specific that happened or an action that took place.

Examples:

I was angry at myself for making such a silly mistake.
She was angry at the way he treated her.
He was angry at the unfair decision.
They were angry at the delay in the project completion.
The customers were angry at the poor service.

Alternatives:

I was upset about
I was frustrated by
I was annoyed by
I was disappointed with
I was mad about

Use 'I was angry with' when you want to express anger towards a specific person or individual.

Examples:

I was angry with my brother for breaking my toy.
She was angry with her boss for not giving her a raise.
He was angry with his friend for betraying his trust.
They were angry with the teacher for being unfair.
The customer was angry with the salesperson for being rude.

Alternatives:

I was mad at
I was upset with
I was annoyed with
I was frustrated with
I was disappointed with

Answer 1

I was angry at

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when expressing anger towards a specific action or event.

Answer 2

I was angry with

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English when expressing anger towards a person.

"I was angry at" vs "I was angry with"

I was angry at

I was angry with

Related Comparisons