"i have been in london" vs "i have been to london"

Question

"i have been in london" vs "i have been to london"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'I have been to London' is used when referring to visiting a place, while 'I have been in London' is used when talking about being physically present in a location. They are not interchangeable as they convey different meanings.

Last Updated: March 28, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate that you were physically present in London at some point in the past.

Examples:

I have been in London for a week.
She has been in London since last month.
Have you ever been in London during the winter?
He has been in London for a business meeting.
They have been in London for sightseeing.

Alternatives:

I have stayed in London.
I have lived in London.
I have spent time in London.
I have been living in London.
I have been working in London.

This phrase is used to indicate that you have visited London at some point in the past.

Examples:

I have been to London several times.
Have you ever been to London?
She has been to London for a business trip.

Alternatives:

I have visited London.
I have traveled to London.
I have been to other cities in the UK.
I have been to many places around the world.
I have been to London before.

Answer 1

i have been in london

This phrase is correct and commonly used when talking about being physically present in a location.

Answer 2

i have been to london

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to visiting a place.

"i have been in london" vs "i have been to london"

i have been in london

i have been to london

Related Comparisons