"i was moving to" vs "i was moving to london"

Question

"i was moving to" vs "i was moving to london"

The two phrases are not directly comparable as one is a complete sentence while the other is a fragment. "I was moving to London" is a complete sentence that provides a clear and specific location, while "I was moving to" is an incomplete fragment that lacks the necessary information to convey a complete thought.

Last Updated: March 20, 2024

To make this phrase correct, you need to add a specific location after 'to,' such as a city, country, or place.

Use this phrase when you want to convey that you were in the process of relocating to London.

Examples:

I was moving to London for a new job opportunity.
She told me she was moving to London next month.

Answer 1

i was moving to

This phrase is not correct as it is an incomplete fragment that lacks the necessary information to convey a complete thought.

Answer 2

i was moving to london

This phrase is correct as it forms a complete sentence with a specific location (London) provided.

"i was moving to" vs "i was moving to london"

i was moving to

i was moving to london

Related Comparisons