"have been broken" vs "have become too broken"

Question

"have been broken" vs "have become too broken"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in different contexts. 'Have been broken' is used to indicate the state of something that has been damaged or shattered, while 'have become too broken' is used to emphasize that something has reached a state of being excessively damaged. They are not directly comparable as they convey slightly different meanings.

Last Updated: March 31, 2024

This phrase is used to describe the result of an action that caused something to be damaged or shattered. It is often used in past tense sentences.

Examples:

The vase has been broken.
The window has been broken by the storm.
Her heart has been broken too many times.
The rules have been broken repeatedly.
The silence has been broken by a loud noise.

Alternatives:

has been damaged
has been shattered
has been destroyed
has been cracked
has been fractured

This phrase is used when you want to stress that something has become too damaged or broken beyond repair. It is often used to express a negative outcome or situation.

Alternatives:

have become too damaged
have become too shattered
have become too destroyed
have become too cracked
have become too fractured

Answer 1

have been broken

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English to indicate the state of something that has been damaged or shattered.

Answer 2

have become too broken

This phrase is correct but less commonly used in English. It is used to emphasize that something has reached a state of being excessively damaged.

"have been broken" vs "have become too broken"

have been broken

have become too broken

Related Comparisons