"evidence did not show" vs "evidence did not indicate"

Question

"evidence did not show" vs "evidence did not indicate"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Evidence did not show' is commonly used when referring to the lack of proof or demonstration of something, while 'evidence did not indicate' is more often used when talking about the absence of signs or suggestions of something.

Last Updated: March 19, 2024

This phrase is used to indicate that the evidence presented did not demonstrate or prove a particular point or fact.

Examples:

The evidence did not show a clear link between the suspect and the crime scene.
Despite thorough investigation, the evidence did not show any connection between the two incidents.

Alternatives:

evidence did not demonstrate
evidence did not reveal
evidence did not prove
evidence did not support
evidence did not establish

This phrase is used to convey that the evidence presented did not suggest or point to a particular conclusion or outcome.

Examples:

The results of the investigation did not indicate any foul play.
The data collected did not indicate a significant impact on the environment.

Alternatives:

evidence did not suggest
evidence did not point to
evidence did not imply
evidence did not hint at
evidence did not signal

Answer 1

evidence did not show

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

evidence did not indicate

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"evidence did not show" vs "evidence did not indicate"

evidence did not show

evidence did not indicate

Related Comparisons