"evidence did not illustrate" vs "evidence did not portray"

Question

"evidence did not illustrate" vs "evidence did not portray"

Both phrases are correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. 'Evidence did not portray' is commonly used when referring to how something was represented or depicted, while 'evidence did not illustrate' is more appropriate when discussing how something was explained or clarified.

Last Updated: March 19, 2024

This phrase is used when discussing how something was explained or clarified in the evidence.

Examples:

The report did not illustrate the connection between the two events.
The evidence did not illustrate the suspect's motive.

Alternatives:

evidence did not explain
evidence did not clarify
evidence did not elucidate
evidence did not demonstrate
evidence did not highlight

This phrase is used when referring to how something was represented or depicted in the evidence.

Examples:

The evidence did not portray an accurate picture of the situation.
The witness's testimony did not portray events accurately.

Alternatives:

evidence did not depict
evidence did not show
evidence did not represent
evidence did not reflect
evidence did not convey

Answer 1

evidence did not illustrate

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Answer 2

evidence did not portray

This phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

"evidence did not illustrate" vs "evidence did not portray"

evidence did not illustrate

evidence did not portray

Related Comparisons