"bound by" vs "bound with"

Question

"bound by" vs "bound with"

Both "bound with" and "bound by" are correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Bound with" is used when referring to physically attaching or securing something with another object, while "bound by" is used when referring to being restricted or obligated by rules, laws, or agreements.

Last Updated: March 22, 2024

Use "bound by" when you want to indicate that someone is restricted or obligated by rules, laws, or agreements. It is often used in contexts like contracts, where parties are bound by the terms of the agreement.

Examples:

He was bound by the terms of the contract.
We are bound by the laws of the land.
She felt bound by her promise.
The company is bound by industry regulations.
They are bound by tradition.

Alternatives:

constrained by
obligated by
restricted by
governed by
held by

Use "bound with" when you want to indicate that something is physically attached or secured with another object. It is often used in contexts like bookbinding, where pages are bound with thread or glue.

Examples:

The book was bound with a beautiful leather cover.
The flowers were bound with a ribbon.
The papers were bound with a metal clip.
The parcels were bound with twine.
The ingredients were bound with a sticky sauce.

Alternatives:

tied with
secured with
fastened with
attached with
connected with

Answer 1

bound by

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to being restricted or obligated by rules, laws, or agreements.

Answer 2

bound with

This phrase is correct and commonly used when referring to physically attaching or securing something with another object.

"bound by" vs "bound with"

bound by

bound with

Related Comparisons